Legal Opinion

(PS) Robinson v. Carmax Auto Finance, LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 8, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02795Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY ROBINSON, JR., Case No. 2:24-cv-2795-DJC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. 14 CARMAX AUTO FINANCE, LLC, et al., (ECF Nos. 1, 2) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Anthony Robinson, Jr. is representing himself in this action and seeks 18 leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915.1

(ECF No. 2.) 19 For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends Plaintiff’s IFP application be denied, 20 and the Complaint be dismissed with leave to amend. 21 I. MOTION TO…

2Cases cited25 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.