Legal Opinion

Handelman v. Victor Equipment Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1971No. Civ. 38190PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendant a new trial upon the ground that the sum awarded as general damages by the jury ($70,000) was insufficiently supported by the evidence and, therefore, excessive; the court further ordered that the new trial be limited to the issue of damages.

By occupation a professional deep water helium diver, plaintiff sustained an attack of oxygen poisoning resulting from an incorrect mixture of diving gas (the amount of oxygen being disproportionate to that of helium) supplied by defendant company. While various items of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Scala v. Jerry Witt & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Connolly v. Pre-Mixed Concrete Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Conner v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. LitzenbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Bigboy v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Hager v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API