Metowski v. Traid Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KEANE, J. *
Fifty named plaintiffs sue individually and as members of a class consisting of themselves and 100,000 other purchasers of Fotron cameras. Demurrers to plaintiffs’ third amended complaint were sustained. The trial court held that plaintiffs could not maintain a class action, sustained demurrers without leave to amend to -that aspect of plaintiffs’ pleading and entered judgment of dismissal of the class suit. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment. Thus, we are called upon to determine whether the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer on the ground the complaint did not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Collins v. RochaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Vogel v. Thrifty Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Whitfield v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Daugherty v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Osborne v. Subaru of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Keith v. BuchananCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.