Ross v. Rees
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from WmnesMek Circmt Court. Action in chancery. There was a decree dismissing plaintiff’s petition and granting the relief prayed for by defendant, D. E. Eees, in his cross-bill. From the decree dismissing plaintiff’s petition he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
I. The amended and substituted petition, upon which the case was finally submitted for trial, alleges that, from 1843 to 1856 Samuel D. and Jacob Eees were co-partners in the milling business in. Berkley county, Virginia, under the firm name of S. D. Eees & Co.; that plaintiff became the indorser and surety for said firm to several parties, and judgment was rendered against him upon one claim and his property sold thereon, and two other claims he paid; that the aggregate amount of these claims and interest thereon is $24,000; that July 10, 1856, Samuel D. Eees and wife executed to David E.…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Merchants & Planters National Bank of Sherman v. AppleyardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- McNamara v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- City of Davenport v. AllenU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1903
- Page v. PedenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Merchants & Planters National Bank of Sherman v. AppleyardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953