Zickel v. Knell

[60] Action for dissolution' of ; a partnership agreement, accounting to determine profits and plaintiff’s share therein, and ■ for receiver pendente lite. Plaintiff alleged that more than $3932.00. was due him. Defendants denied the existence of a partnership, stated a first counter-claim for $3384.66, claimed to be due them from plaintiff; and stated a second counter-claim for malicious prosecution for $50,000.00 actual and $25,000.00 punitive -damages. The court found that a limited partnership or joint adventure existed between plaintiff and defendants Mr. and Mrs. Otto A. 'Knell, Sr.…