Legal Opinion

Manufacturers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Hopson

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1940PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

This is a motion by petitioners, stockholders of Associated Gas and Electric Company, to vacate and set aside a stipulation of discontinuance in an action heretofore instituted by other stockholders, as plaintiffs, against the company. A trustee for the Associated Gas and Electric Company (herein called the debtor), appointed by the United States District Court, seeks similar relief in order that he, too, might join in prosecuting the former action. That action, instituted in October, 1934, was the conventional derivative suit against the debtor as the nominal defendant and its directors as…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Royal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Hirshfeld v. . FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Innes v. LansingNew York Court of Chancery · 1839

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Winkelman v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  2. Clarke v. GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Manufacturers Mutual Fire Insurance of Rhode Island v. HopsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Balbert v. BalbertNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Dictograph Products, Inc. v. Empire State Hearing Aid Bureau, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API