Scott & Fetzer Co. v. McCarty
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WITH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
LAMEROS, District Judge.
I. FACTS
There are no sharply disputed questions of fact. Plaintiff Scott & Fetzer Company has brought this action (the Ohio action) against defendant John S. McCarty, seeking a declaratory judgment that plaintiff’s termination of a Distributor Agreement with the defendant was in accordance with the terms of that agreement and was not violative of the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Subsequently, defendant in this case brought suit in the Superior Court of New Jersey (the New Jersey action)…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Semmes Motors, Inc., Suing on Behalf of Itself and Together With Ford Dealers Alliance, Inc., Etc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Southern Construction Co. v. PickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Columbia Plaza Corporation v. Security National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Leon F. Urbain and Loxit Systems, Inc. v. Knapp Brothers Manufacturing Company, Al Levinson, Charles Levinson, and Robert LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Seattle Totems Hockey Club, Inc., Eldred W. Barnes and Vincent H. D. Abbey v. The National Hockey League, Northwest Sports Enterprises, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Federal Leasing, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Ohio v. RhodesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1979
- SW Industries, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1987
- Daimler-Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.