Miner v. Beurmann
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus by James H. Miner against E. Miller Beurmann, to test respondent’s right to the office of supervisor.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Upon the petition of the relator, an order was made that the respondent show cause why he should not be directed to turn over to relator all of the records, *673books, and papers belonging to the office of the supervisor of the township of Howell, in Livingston county.
It appears that at the election held on April 3,1911, the relator and the respondent were duly and regularly nominated by their respective parties for the office of supervisor of said township, and both received votes at said election therefor. The township is divided into two voting districts, in each of which both of said parties…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Maynard v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Frey v. MichieMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Attorney General ex rel. Dusenbury v. LookerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- May v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Ashwell v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Campbell v. RamseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Wheeler v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- People ex rel. Artis v. RannMichigan Supreme Court · 1921