Legal Opinion

Myers v. Quesenberry

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1983No. 26873PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

144 Cal.App.3d 888 (1983)

193 Cal. Rptr. 733

JAMES A. MYERS, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM O. QUESENBERRY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Docket No. 26873.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

June 27, 1983.

COUNSEL

Mathews, Bergen, Potash & Grier and John C. Grier for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Rhoades, Hollywood & Neil and Daniel S. Belsky for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

WIENER, J.

The question presented in this case is whether liability may be imposed against two physicians for negligently failing to warn their patient of the foreseeable and dangerous…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lopez v. McDonald's Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Molsbergen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Leavitt v. Brockton Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. Clarke v. HoekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Molsbergen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API