Legal Opinion
United States v. Wolfe
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 26, 1974No. Crim. 73-650PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HANNUM, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the motion of defendants Stanley Wolfe and Nathan Wolfe to suppress evidence. Following a hearing on the motion, the Court took the motion under advisement. The defendants, in their memorandum submitted to the Court, cite four reasons in support of their motion. We shall consider each of these contentions in turn.
WAS THE AFFIDAVIT UPON WHICH THE WARRANT WAS ISSUED FOR THE SEARCH OF THE PREMISES AT 3226 W. CHELTENHAM AVENUE SUFFICIENT TO JUSTIFY THE FINDING OF ' PROBABLE CAUSE?
On March 21, 1973, U. S. Magistrate Naythons…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. VentoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. James Elkins Carol Elkins, United States of America v. Carol Elkins James ElkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Everhart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- State v. KoucoulesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- State v. KenderHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.