Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. Yount

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1983No. C-820528PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The single question raised in this appeal is whether an easement that arose by implication of law subsequent to the registration of title to the two parcels of real estate under R.C. Chapters 5309 and 5310 can be recognized and enforced against the alleged servient estate if the implied easement is not noted or memorialized on the register of titles. We answer the question in the negative.

Plaintiff, Ellery C. Kincaid, claims to have an implied easement across defendant John H. Yount’s parcel under the circumstances disclosed by the record. Both parcels of land were part of a larger tract that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ciski v. WentworthOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Carter v. MichelIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Curry v. LybargerOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Becker v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Gough Lumber Co. v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Menninger v. Accredited Home Lenders (In Re Morgeson)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Bavely v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Cowan)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. Robert S. Unpingco v. Antolin DerrySupreme Court of Guam · 2021
  4. State v. BembryOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Burks v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. (In re Goheen)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API