Legal Opinion

Coverdale v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Indictment for retailing without license. ' Motion to quash overruled; trial; conviction and fine, severally against each defendant; appeal by the defendant Coverdale, to this court.

The only assignment of error in this court is, that the circuit court erred in overruling the motion to quash.

• The indictment charges, that “ William Coverdale and Luther-Lebo, late of said county, on the 20th day of August, A. D. 1877, at said comity and State aforesaid, did then and there sell to Ananias Thompson, one gill of an *308intoxicating liquor, at and for the price of ten cents, they, the said William…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hooper v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Simpson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. State v. CarpenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Downey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gavalis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Wills v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Callahan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API