Legal Opinion

Brickman v. Maximus, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 17, 2023No. 2:21-cv-03822Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION James P. Brickman, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:21-cv-3822 V. Judge Michael H. Watson Maximus, Inc., et al., Magistrate Judge Jolson Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER In response to the Court’s prior Order considering the motion to dismiss, ECF No. 36, James P. Brickman (“Plaintiff’) and Maximus, Inc. and Maximus US Services, Inc. (“Defendants”) filed supplemental briefs on the applicability of the economic loss rule to Plaintiff's negligence claim. ECF Nos. 37, 39, & 40. For the following reasons, the economic loss rule bars…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Floor Craft Floor Covering, Inc. v. Parma Community General Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API