Legal Opinion

Hall Signal Co. v. General Ry. Signal Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York

Decided June 18, 1909No. 284Published

In Equity. On settlement of final decree.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

The patent in this action has expired, and the mandate of the Circuit Court of Appeals affirming the decision of this court, holding claim 1 of the patent valid and infringed, directs that further proceedings be had in accordance with the decision of this court, and the opinion of Judge Coxe, writing for¡ the court,. says:

“The patent having expired, the paragraph of the decree providing for an injunction should be modified by the Circuit Court.” >

Accordingly. the decree submitted by complainant enjoins the defendant from dealing in any signaling apparatus or systems…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Diamond Rock Boring Co. v. SheldonUnited States Circuit Court · 1880
  2. Johnson v. Brooklyn & C. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1888
  3. Toledo Mower & Reaper Co. v. Johnston Harvester Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1885
  4. New York Belting & Packing Co. v. MagowanUnited States Circuit Court · 1886
  5. American Diamond Rock Boring Co. v. Rutland Marble Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API