Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Woods

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1970PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam G. Easton, J.

This is a motion by the plaintiff pursuant to subdivision (b) of CPLB 3024 to strike the allegations contained in paragraph “ Ninth ” of the answer of the defendant George A. Skivington on the ground that such allegations are prejudicial, sham and frivolous and irrelevant. This is a death action on behalf of the deceased who was a passenger. The ninth paragraph of the said defendant’s answer, included in a “Further, Separate and Distinct Defense ”, read as follows: “ninth: That the contributory negligence of plaintiff’s intestate at said time and place consisted, upon information and belief,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spier v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Curry v. MoserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Derheim v. N. Fiorito Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Spier v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  5. Derheim v. N. Fiorito Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API