Abrams v. Woods
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam G. Easton, J.
This is a motion by the plaintiff pursuant to subdivision (b) of CPLB 3024 to strike the allegations contained in paragraph “ Ninth ” of the answer of the defendant George A. Skivington on the ground that such allegations are prejudicial, sham and frivolous and irrelevant. This is a death action on behalf of the deceased who was a passenger. The ninth paragraph of the said defendant’s answer, included in a “Further, Separate and Distinct Defense ”, read as follows: “ninth: That the contributory negligence of plaintiff’s intestate at said time and place consisted, upon information and belief,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Spier v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Curry v. MoserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Derheim v. N. Fiorito Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
- Spier v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Derheim v. N. Fiorito Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.