Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ponce v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1996Published

1DissentKelley, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

In this appeal, Ponce claims, inter alia, that the one-year suspension of his operating privileges imposed by the Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (DOT) for his failure to submit to chemical testing pursuant to section 1547 of the Vehicle Code (Implied Consent Law)1 is precluded by the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution as it constitutes a second attempt by the Commonwealth to punish him for the offense of driving while under the influence of alcohol, 75 Pa.C.S. § 3731. Because I believe that Ponce is correct that the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Price v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API