Legal Opinion

Burbank v. H.D. Goodall Hospital

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 10, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

Donna Burbank appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission denying her petition for protection of the Act in connection with a neck and arm condition that Burbank claims arose as a consequence of her work-related back injury. 39 M.R.S.A. § 94 (1989).1 Because we conclude that in the absence of a dispute about compensation Burbank is not entitled to a factual determination regarding physical conditions that are sequelae of a compensable injury, we affirm the Commission’s decision.

Burbank suffered an injury on December 7, 1988, while employed by H.D. Goodall…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Nielsen v. Burnham & Morrill, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  3. Crocker v. Eastland Woolen Mill, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. Lamson v. Central Maine Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DeRice v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  2. Libby v. Boise Cascade Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API