Legal Opinion

Marine Bank & Trust Co. v. Martel

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeche, J.

The defendants in this ease have appealed from an order of executory process and plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the surety on the appeal bond does not reside in the parish of Iberia, where the suit is pending, but in the parish of Vermilion, outside the jurisdiction of the court.

Act 67 of 1876, p. 109, requires the surety on an appeal bond to be domiciled within the jurisdiction of the court, otherwise the appeal must be dismissed. State ex rel. Veith vs. Capdevielle, 140 La. 812, 74 South. 110. For that reason the appeal in this case must therefore be dismissed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perrin v. Stuyvesant Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. State ex rel. Veith v. CapdevielleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartman-Salmen Co. v. MaloneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Anagnosti v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Stewart v. ClaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API