Brandner v. Municipality of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLGER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Sheila Brandner appeals the Anchorage Municipal Board of Equalization's (the Board's) valuation of her home for the 2012 tax year. She argues that the Municipal assessor's office used an improper appraisal method and that the Board overestimated the value of her property. We conclude that the Board made a clerical error in the caleu-lation of the value of Brandner's property. We therefore remand to the Board to adopt a final assessment of $420,700, which is consistent with the Board's intent.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
The property at issue in this appeal is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gilbert v. Nina Plaza Condo Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Horan v. Kenai Peninsula Borough Board of EqualizationAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Stein v. KelsoAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Farmer v. State, Department of Law, Office of the Attorney GeneralAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Varilek v. BurkeAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
3Cited by2 opinions
- Briggs v. City of PalmerAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Kelley v. Municipality AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2019