Ponder v. Gibson-Homans Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). In Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Enoch, 79 Ark. 475, the court held that one who has purchased personal property subject to a lien for the purchase money has an insurable interest therein.
The general rule also is that a mortgagee of real property who gets insurance for himself, when the insurance is general upon the property, without limiting it in terms to his interest as mortgagee, but when, in point of fact, his only insurable interest is that of a mortgagee, in case of a loss by fire, before the payment of the debt and discharge of the Mortgage, has a right…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. EnochSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Callahan v. LinthicumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Concord Union Mut. F. Insurance v. WoodburySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1858
- Stuyvesant Insurance v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Fox v. Phenix Fire Ins.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1864
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Whitley v. IrwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Elk Horn Bank & Trust Co. v. SpragginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Wriedt v. BeckenhauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Miller v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Moline Timber Co. v. SchaadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.