Legal Opinion

Moline Timber Co. v. Schaad

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 19, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellees brought this suit to reform a fire insurance policy, and to collect the proceeds thereof after a loss had been sustained by fire, and in support of their cause- of action offered testimony to the following effect: Appellees sold some sawmill machinery to J. L. Young. Part of the purchase price was paid in cash, ■and the balance was evidenced by what was termed “title retaining notes.” The contract of sale provided that Young should carry fire insurance on the machinery until the indebtedness was fully paid, the loss, if any, being payable to appellees as their interest might appear.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance v. EnochSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. Ponder v. Gibson-Homans Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  3. Crouthers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Casualty Co. v. HambletonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Commercial Union Fire Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. ParvinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. Calvert Fire Insurance v. HardwickeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API