Legal Opinion
Paramount Pictures Corp. v. Davis
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 2, 2005No. Civ.A. 05-0316PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*104 MEMORANDUM
O’NEILL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Paramount Pictures Corp., filed a John Doe complaint on January 21, 2005 under the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq., claiming that defendant, later identified as John Davis, pro se, violated its exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute plaintiffs motion picture, “Lemony Snicket’s: A Series of Unfortunate Events,” by willfully and knowingly obtaining an illegal digital copy of the motion picture and making the motion picture available for digital distribution via an internet distribution system named eDonkey one week after the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Alston v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Judson C. Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation Quaker State CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Teleglobe USA, Inc. v. BCE Inc. (In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Brooks v. AM Resorts, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Sarmiento v. Montclair State UniversityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- United States v. BuntyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Estate of Costobile-Fulginiti v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.