Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eskridge v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1972No. 771S197Published

1Dissent

*371Dissenting Opinion

DeBruler, J.

Appellant was convicted on this charge in a trial without jury. Pursuant to TR. 59A(4) appellant filed a motion to correct errors based solely on the insufficiency of the evidence to show the required intent and she requested a discharge. The trial court granted appellant’s motion to correct errors but instead of discharging her, he immediately set the case for re-trial in thirteen days. Appellant filed a motion to discharge on the ground that to try appellant for the same offense would constitute double jeopardy in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API