Legal Opinion

United States v. James Mitchell, Aka/jim Mitchell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 1, 1990No. 88-5063PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NELSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant James Mitchell was charged with knowingly receiving material depicting minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct in violation of the Child Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2), following the government’s targeting and soliciting him in a sting operation known as “Project Looking Glass.” Mitchell moved for dismissal of his indictment on grounds of outrageous government conduct. The district court denied the motion on the grounds that appellant had been predisposed to commit the crime and that the sting operation did not constitute outrageous government…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. The Presbyterian Church (u.s.a.) v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Johns v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. GiffordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. Hans Johns v. County Of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Newlin v. Winchester (In Re Newlin)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API