John Doherty v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal from a judgment of conviction in a narcotics case, 21 U.S.C. § 174, is predicated upon the assumption that the California rule declining to-credit testimony of an accomplice, unless corroborated, is applicable in the Federal courts. Cal.Penal Code, § 1111; People v. Dail, 1943, 22 Cal.2d 642, 140 P.2d 828.
In the exercise of supervisory authority over rules governing the admissibility of evidence in federal criminal trials, McNabb v. United States, 1943, 318 U.S. 332, 341, 63 S.Ct. 608, 87 L.Ed. 819, the Supreme Court has held that corroboration is not essential. Caminetti v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Holmgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Robert Edgar Channel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. James Allen HiblerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- J. W. Williamson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- James Henry Audett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Jack Wayne Lyles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.