Merkel v. T. A. Gillespie Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Ctjeiam.
There are two matters before us.
Cause Pío. 224 is a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Essex county dismissing an appeal in a workmen’s compensation matter, and Pío. 255 is a motion to dismiss the appeal to this court, in the same matter, for lack of diligent prosecution.
Dealing with the latter cause first, it might well be dismissed because of non-compliance with our rules. Proper diligence is not perfectly apparent but by our disposition of the cause, upon its merits, legal and factual, respondent is not disadvantaged by a refusal to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Hulley v. MoosbruggerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Schmoll v. Weisbrod & Hess Brewing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- Walther v. American Paper Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- Ratkewicz v. KaraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
3Cited by13 opinions
- Johnson v. SafreedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Stephens v. Spuck Iron & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Martin v. Snuffy's Steak HouseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Crowder v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
- Jackson v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.