Legal Opinion

Billups v. American Surety Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 10, 1950No. T-20PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELLOTT, District Judge.

The - motion to remand requires- interpretation of Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1441(c), shown in the margin. 1 The issue, succinctly stated, is whether a nonresident of Kansas, joined as a defendant with a resident of that state, may remove to this court, the complaint charging joint negligence of the two defendants but not identical acts of negligence.

Summarizing the facts pleaded, two vehicles, proceeding in the same direction along a public highway, collided, the second caroming to the left and into the pathway of a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction. It is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bentley v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  2. Taggart v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. Tilden v. AshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Gibson v. BodleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Robinson v. Missouri Pacific Transp. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Doran v. Elgin Cooperative Credit Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1950
  2. Willoughby v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Anderson v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1962
  4. Lejeune v. Midwestern Ins. Co. of Oklahoma CityDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1951
  5. Rodewald v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API