Anderson v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
ARTHUR J. STANLEY, Jr., Chief Judge.
This is an action for injuries allegedly caused by the concurrent negligence of defendants. The liability of defendant, Union Pacific Railroad, is predicated on the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 51-60. Liability of the other defendant, Sealright Oswego Falls, hereinafter called Seal-right, is based on common law negligence. The ease, filed originally in the state court, was removed to this court upon the petition of Sealright and is presently under advisement on plaintiff’s motion to remand to the state court.
As authority for removal,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Greenshields v. Warren Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Southern Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Bentley v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Pearce v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Walls, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1970
- Solis v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1972
- Hunter v. Missouri-Pacific-Texas RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1966