Desautel v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau

I am unable to agree with the conclusion at which the foregoing opinion arrives.

Beading the complaint most liberally, and giving the plaintiff the benefit of every intendment, what she there says amounts to this: She was employed by the Institution for the Feeble-minded. Her hours were from 6 A. PI. to 1:15 P. PL She was allowed thirty minutes for lunch — from 12:30 to 1 P. PL Her home was across the way from the premises of her employer and some two or three hundred yards from the ward in which she worked. She was to eat her lunch at home and return to her duties within the half hour…