Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. Rozan

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2011No. 20110031PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINE ORDERED

2Per curiam

[¶ 1] The Supreme Court has before it Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations by the Hearing Panel of the Disciplinary Board recommending Steven Jay Rozan be disbarred from the practice of law in North Dakota, he pay costs of the disciplinary proceeding, he pay restitution to the involved client, and other sanctions for violations of the North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct. We conclude there is clear and convincing evidence Rozan violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.1, N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.4(a) and (b), N.D.R. Prof. Conduct…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ranta v. McCarneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Disciplinary Board v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Rowan v. Dream It, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Judicial Conduct Commission v. CorwinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API