Legal Opinion

People v. Ortega

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1991PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was convicted of two counts of criminal sale and possession of a controlled substance. The sale of cocaine upon which defendant’s conviction was predicated took place after a confidential informant introduced an undercover police officer to the defendant.

During cross-examination, the undercover officer refused to disclose the identity of the confidential informant. Recognizing that the court had to decide whether or not to require disclosure pursuant to guidelines set forth in People v Goggins (34…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. GogginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. DarbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. TuraineNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. SpotfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. FabricioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. People v. MelendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. LovettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API