Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Cobb

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided June 20, 2006No. 04-22572-CIVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL REQUIRING MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AS TO FEDERAL CLAIMS

JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge.

This Cause is before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (DE # 150), filed May 16, 2006. 1 Oral Argument was held May 31, 2006.

I. Factual Background

Individual Plaintiffs Diaz and Lanman registered to vote in the fall of 2004. Plaintiff Diaz was informed orally on October 6, 2004, and in writing two days later, that her application had been rejected for failure to check the box on the application affirming that she had not been adjudicated…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Ned L. Siegel, Georgette Sosa Douglas v. Theresa Lepore, Charles E. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Dodd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Collins v. Greater Atlantic Mortgage Corp. (In Re Lazarus)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  2. Diaz v. CobbDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API