State Ex Rel. Struble v. Davis
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
One of the contentions of the respondents is that the relator lacks the capacity to institute this action attacking the constitutionality of House Bill 674 (115 Ohio Laws, 546), passed July 1, 1933, and Amended Senate Bill 23 (116 Ohio Laws, 26), passed March 5, 1935, in which an attempt is made to exempt from assessment of taxes all the property, except real estate, of interurban railroad companies for the period beginning January 1, 1932, and ending December 31, 1936. It is admitted that the relator is a taxpayer of the state of Ohio but is not a public utility or the owner or…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Coyne v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Pierce v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Coyne v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Brunenkant v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Stubbs v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.