Legal Opinion
Hendry v. Hendry
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 9, 1918PublishedCited by 17 opinions
From Multnomah: William N. Gatens, Judge. Department 2. This is a suit for divorce. There was a decree for plaintiff and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, C. J.
1. In these cases a recital of the testimony is worse than valueless, serving only to spread upon the record the details of domestic discord, of which the least said the better. The testimony is contradictory, and as the trial judge had the witnesses before him he was much better able to appraise the value of the testimony than we. Upon the whole, we are of the opinion that the evidence sustains the decree, and it is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.
Moore, McCamant and Bean, JJ., concur.
2Cited by17 opinions
- Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Iwanicki v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Markel v. Transamerica Title Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Elwert v. Pacific First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.