Legal Opinion
United States v. Davis
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 4, 2009No. Criminal Action 03-348 (RWR)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Defendant Jack Davis filed a motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 for a new trial claiming that a newly conceived argument for impeaching an FBI agent’s trial testimony is newly discovered evidence, and that an alleged comment by a juror months after the trial about misunderstanding the court’s instructions entitles Davis to an evidentiary hearing. The government opposes Davis’ motion. Because Davis has not shown that the agent’s testimony is newly discovered, that he is entitled to a hearing, or that his new argument would…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. DaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Tom Vig, United States of America v. Donovan VigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Robert H. Campbell, United States of America v. Excavation Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Robert M. SensiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HurdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- United States v. SheffieldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- State v. HurdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- United States v. RobinsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020