Legal Opinion
State v. Hurd
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 16, 2010No. Docket: Fra-09-560PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] This appeal asks us to consider M.R. Evid. 606(b) and our prior precedents holding that, to protect the integrity of the jury deliberation and verdict announcement process, a trial court, once it has taken a verdict and discharged a jury, may not reconvene the jury, permit the jury to impeach its original verdict, accept a different verdict, and enter judgment in accordance with that different verdict.
[¶ 2] Ryan A. Hurd appeals from a judgment of conviction of aggravated operating under the influence (OUI) (Class C), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(D)(1) (2007 & 2009),1 entered in the Superior…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Pittston Coal Group v. SebbenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Nicholas, ConnieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State of Maine v. Victoria ScottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- State v. PerrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- State of Maine v. Todd J. PerkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- State v. CookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.