Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. Social Security Administration

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 22, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01620Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADAMINA MCKENZIE, et al. Case No. 1:23-cv-01620-CDB 12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT WITH 13 v. PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO 14 AMEND SOCIAL SECURITY 15 ADMINISTRATION. (Doc. 1) 16 Defendant. TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE 17 Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge 18 19 Plaintiffs Adamina McKenzie and Elliot McKenzie (hereinafter collectively “Plaintiffs”) 20 are proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this action against Defendant the Social 21…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API