Legal Opinion

State v. Zickefoose

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1969No. 719PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtYounger, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Findlay Municipal Court finding the defendant, appellant herein, guilty of the crime of “indecent exposure.”

The narrative bill of exceptions shows that no testimony was given nor was any reference made as to the defendant’s age. At the conclusion of the state’s case the defendant made a motion to dismiss the case “for failure of the state to prove the elements of the offense, namely the age of the defendant.” This motion was overruled.

Thereupon the defendant “over objections” took the stand and testified that he was employed at McComb, Ohio, and that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LathamOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. City of Cincinnati v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ShoeOhio Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API