Legal Opinion

State v. Shoe

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 1969No. 688PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKerns, P. J.

The defendant, appellant herein, Edward L. Shoe, was charged with the crime of sodomy in an indictment which provides, in substance, that:

“he unlawfully did have carnal copulation with another human being in an opening of the body other than a sexual part, to wit: being a person of Charles Trisler contrary to Section 2905.44 of the Revised Code of Ohio.”

Shoe entered a plea of not guilty, waived a trial by jury, and was tried by the Court of Common Pleas of Miami County. The trial court found him not guilty of the charge of sodomy, but guilty of a violation of Section 2903.01, Revised Code,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

State v. LathamOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
State v. DecamilloAshtabula County Court of Common Pleas · 1961
State v. ByrdOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
City of Cincinnati v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
Cantway v. MaxwellOhio Court of Appeals · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Edward Ray Stacy v. Charles Van Curen, Supt. Of Lebanon Correctional InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970