Legal Opinion

In Re Scott

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 6, 1987No. 86-4156Published

1Opinion of the Court

829 F.2d 865

In re Ben and Peg SCOTT, husband and wife, d/b/a Scotland

Farm, Debtors.

FRONTIER BANK, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Ben SCOTT and Peg Scott, husband and wife, d/b/a Scotland

Farm; Frank D. Howard and Gala S. Howard, husband

and wife; Randy Hannon and Marion

Hannon, husband and wife,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-4156.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 5, 1987.

Decided Oct. 6, 1987.

Blair B. Burroughs and Thomas S. Linde, Mills & Cogan, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff-appellant.

John G. Cooper, Seattle, Wash., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chase National Bank v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Kendrick v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hackler v. HacklerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. Rose v. RundallWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Stevens v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API