Legal Opinion

Ward v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 22, 2007No. CR 06-1327PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellee moves the Court to seal portions of the record and portions of appellant’s brief containing copies of photographs showing nude minors. The State argues that public inspection could place the minors at risk of embarrassment or exploitation. In support of its motion, the State cites Arkansas Dep’t of Human Servs. v. Hardy, 316 Ark. 119, 871 S.W.2d 352 (1994), which deals with whether authority exists to seal a final order. The holding in Hardy was limited to the facts of that case.

We have recognized the inherent authority of the trial court to control court records, and, thus, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Fayetteville v. EdmarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. HardySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  2. Hausman v. ThroeschCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Hausman v. ThroeschCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API