Legal Opinion
Hausman v. Throesch
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided December 10, 2008No. CA 08-478Published
1Opinion of the Court
289 S.W.3d 493 (2008)
Virgil HAUSMAN, Dorothy Hausman, Dwain Hausman, and Vernon Hausman, Appellants,
v.
Dale THROESCH, Tonya Throesch, Thomas Throesch, Teresa Throesch, Paul Throesch, and Mary Throesch, Appellees.
No. CA 08-478.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas.
December 10, 2008.
Roy E. Meeks, Ravenden Springs, AR, for appellants.
Don R. Brown, Pocahontas, AR, for appellees.
D.P. MARSHALL JR., Judge.
Does a servient landowner ever have the right to change, without the easement holder's permission, the location of an established easement if the landowner provides an alternate route? We cannot answer that…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Fayetteville v. EdmarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Stacks v. MarksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Oliver v. RouthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Seay v. C.A.R. Transportation Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. AyresSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.