Superhype Publishing, Inc. v. Parrott Development Corp.

OPINION

ENSLEN, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ appeal of the Magistrate Judge Doyle A. Rowland’s Order entered May 9,1995 that granted in part defendants’ motion to compel discovery. Magistrate Judge Rowland ruled that plaintiffs had to respond fully to defendants’ Interrogatory 5, as well as certain other interrogatories and requests to admit, The appeal is limited solely to the order to respond to Interrogatory 5.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), a district judge “... may reconsider any pretrial matter ... where it has been shown that the magistrate judge’s…