Legal Opinion
Seattle First National Bank v. Marusic (In Re Marusic)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 19, 1992No. 18-01152PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PHILIP H. BRANDT, Bankruptcy Judge.
Seattle-First National Bank (“Seafirst”) has moved for summary judgment, presenting the following questions:
1. Whether Bankruptcy Code 1 § 524(b)(2) negates the injunction found in § 524(a)(3), permitting post-discharge enforcement of a pre-petition community claim against post-petition community property of the Debtor when the Debtor’s spouse received a Chapter 7 discharge within the preceding six years, and would be barred from receiving a new discharge by § 727(a)(8);
2. Whether the Seafirst timely requested that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Citibank South Dakota, N.A. v. Dougherty (In Re Dougherty)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Way v. Lyric Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Oregon Improvement Co. v. SagmeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Oil Heat Co. of Port Angeles, Inc. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Burman v. Homan (In Re Homan)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Amjad I. Eashai, Debtor. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Amjad I. EashaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Heilman v. Heilman (In Re Heilman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Rooz v. Kimmel (In Re Kimmel)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Heilman v. Heilman (In Re Heilman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- In Re Amjad I. Eashai, Debtor. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Amjad I. EashaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996