Legal Opinion
In Re Amjad I. Eashai, Debtor. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Amjad I. Eashai
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 2, 1996No. 94-55749Published
1Opinion of the Court
87 F.3d 1082
65 USLW 2047, 29 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 409, Bankr.
L. Rep. P 77,040,
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4948,
96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7976
In re Amjad I. EASHAI, Debtor.
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Amjad I. EASHAI, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-55749.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided July 2, 1996.
Darvy Mack Cohan, La Jolla, California, for appellee.
Andrew E. Smyth, Smyth & Smyth, Los Angeles, California, for appellant.
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.
Before: SCHROEDER, FERGUSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- In Re Ira Laurence Hunter, Debtor. Edwin Schweig v. Ira Laurence HunterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- In the Matter of Michael VAN HORNE. Margaret CASPERS, Appellee, v. Michael VAN HORNE, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.