Legal Opinion

United States v. Summerlin

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 10, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Terrell, C. J. —

This cas.e arises, from these facts: In March, 1935, as provided by the National Housing Act, J. F. Andrew executed his promissory note for $839.86 in favor of W. B. Craig, payable in thirty-six equal monthly installments. The note was transferred to Johns-Manville Credit Corporation. The maker defaulted in his payments and Johns-Manville Credit Corporation made demand on the Federal Housing Administrator for the sum of $529.19, said amount being the balance due on the note. It was paid by draft on the Treasurer of the United States and the latter became the owner of the note.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. United States v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Brooks v. Fed. Land Bk. of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. De La Croix v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1827

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Commerce Union Bank v. GillespieTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  3. United States v. Peoples Household Furnishings, Inc., Edward J. Holland, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. State v. Moore's EstateSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  5. United States v. EmbreySupreme Court of Florida · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API