Bloom v. Crosson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mahoney, J.
Effective April 10, 1992, the Legislature approved a two-year experimental austerity measure under which defendant *343Chief Administrator of the Courts was permitted to "authorize the use of mechanical recording of testimony and of other proceedings in each cause, in lieu of the taking of stenographic minutes thereof, in: (i) a surrogate’s court in any county; and (ii) the court of claims” (L 1992, ch 55, § 414) (hereinafter section 414). Pursuant to that authority, the Chief Administrator, after consultation with and approval by the Chief Judge of the Court of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Sutka v. ConnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Morgenthau v. CookeNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Corkum v. BartlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Lichter v. County of MonmouthNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bloom v. CrossonNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- LaSalle Bank, N.A. v. PaceNew York Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. CorreaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. BartholomewNew York County Court, Broome County · 2011
- Bank of New York Mellon v. IzmirligilNew York Supreme Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.