Corkum v. Bartlett
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
On October 2, 1978, the Office of Court Administration announced the scheduling of public hearings concerning a proposed classification plan and proposed title standards for *427nonjudicial employees of the unified court system.1 The announcement also advised that the hearings would consider an attached "Proposed administrative policy of the Chief Judge concerning the establishment of a classification plan and an appeals procedure”. The attachment indicated that the policy had been approved by the Court of Appeals after consultation by the Chief Judge with the Administrative…
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. CorreaNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Morgenthau v. CookeNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Ass'n of Secretaries to Justices of the Supreme & Surrogate's Courts v. Office of Court AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Evans v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Durante v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.