Legal Opinion

Hockley v. Eastern Transp. Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 25, 1935No. 2039PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

This case now stands for disposition on the merits after hearing testimony and arguments of counsel. The general nature of the case was outlined in a former opinion ([D. C.] 9 F. Supp. 411) covering a point arising on the pleadings, relating to what vessels must be surrendered by the respondent as a condition of exercising the claimed right of limitation of liability, for the loss of a cargo of acid phosphate when the respondent’s chartered barge, the “Calvin” sank in the Patuxent River on January 29, 1934, while on a voyage from Baltimore, Maryland, to Norfolk,…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. La BourgogneSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc. v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Richardson v. HarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons, United States of America and Shalom Baby WearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. The MariaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  3. The Steel InventorDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1940
  4. The Temple BarDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1942
  5. McGhee v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API