Louis v. SUN EDISON, LLC
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant Sun Edison LLC (“Sun Edison”)’s motion for summary judgment. See Doc. No. 23. The Court has reviewed the documents filed by the Parties and finds that no hearing is necessary. See Loe. R. 105(6) (D.Md.2010). For the reasons that follow, the motion will be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Plaintiffs Employment with Sun Edison
Plaintiff Louis Crystal began working for Sun Edison on June 18, 2008 as a Human Resources benefits manager. At Sun Edison, Plaintiff…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mohammed v. Central Driving Mini Storage, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Effland v. Baltimore Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- O'Malley v. Trader Joe's East, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Ross v. ChopraDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021